CPO3D 63rd example: enhancement factor for 2 nearby nanotubes, both of form 'hemisphere on post'.
They are each at a distance 4E-5mm from the centre, so the distance between them is therefore 80nm.
To create a field an anode is placed at an arbitrary 9 micron away, with the appropriate potential to give a 'far field' of 1V/mm.
The field enhancement factor depends only on h/a and s/a.
The ray output file contains the field at 10 points at distances of 0.1 to 1.0 nm from the surface of the cap of one of the nanotubes.
x y z ex ey ez etotal (V/mm)
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 5.00E-08 0.00000E+00 -6.47149E-02 -2.65867E+02 2.65867E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 1.00E-07 0.00000E+00 -1.18480E-01 -2.39702E+02 2.39703E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 1.50E-07 0.00000E+00 -1.60996E-01 -2.19044E+02 2.19044E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 2.00E-07 0.00000E+00 -1.96945E-01 -2.01323E+02 2.01323E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 2.50E-07 0.00000E+00 -2.27962E-01 -1.85851E+02 1.85851E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 3.00E-07 0.00000E+00 -2.54853E-01 -1.72241E+02 1.72241E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 3.50E-07 0.00000E+00 -2.78161E-01 -1.60197E+02 1.60198E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 4.00E-07 0.00000E+00 -2.98412E-01 -1.49483E+02 1.49484E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 4.50E-07 0.00000E+00 -3.16018E-01 -1.39905E+02 1.39905E+02
0.00E+00 4.00E-05 5.00E-07 0.00000E+00 -3.31362E-01 -1.31302E+02 1.31303E+02
Analysis of these results:
The field at points near to the surface are less accurate because the distance from the nearest segment is comparable with the dimensions of the segment.
Extrapolate field to z=0 by extrapolation of E(z)*(z+a)**2. But this extrapolation is not smooth. So take the lowest value of E(z)*(z+a)**2 (which is at z=1.5E-7) and divide it
by a**2, which gives E(a) = 28968.6. Therefore enhancement factor, gamma = 289.69.
Please see the footnotes to the data file for a considerable amount of further information.
Please also see papers 55 and 59 in the publications list.Further results, all for h/a = 500: